Australasian Dentist Issue 93

CATEGORY AUSTRALASIAN DENTIST 77 Photo courtesy of doctors Waldemar Polido, Wei-shao Lin and Dean Morton (USA) Figure 6: View of the final zirconia crown (zerion® UTML, Straumann®) on the printed model and in the patient’s mouth. The complete workflow was digital, with immediate implant placement and temporary restoration – based on intraoral and CBCT scans, 3D planning, software-based diagnostic wax-up and CADCAM fabrication. LINICAL Prosthetic versatility The TLX Implant System is an integral part of the versatile and proven Straumann® prosthetic portfolio. As in the BLX Implant System, the TLX has also been equipped with the TorcFit™ implant-abutment connection optimized for digital workflows. This interface allows easy placement of abutments at soft tissue level and, alternatively, easy handling of direct-to- implant restorations. Screw-retained solutions facilitate retrieval e.g., for maintenance, and reduce concerns about peri-implant inflammation. Based on the open CADCAM platforms, either validated Straumann® or external workflows can be realized. This relates to both single-gap (Figs. 4-6), partially edentulous and full-arch (Figs. 2, 3) implant-retained restorations, in both straightforward and advanced cases. u About the author: Jan H. Koch Dr. med. dent. Graduate of the Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. Dental research and practice from 1990 – 1995. Since 1995: translator, editor, independent journalist and Public Relations specialist in the dental industry (www.dental-journalist.de) . References: 1. Buser D, Chappuis V, Belser UC, Chen S. Implant placement post extraction in esthetic single tooth sites: when immediate, when early, when late? Periodontol 2000 2017;73:84-102. 2. Gallucci GO, Hamilton A, Zhou W, Buser D, Chen S. Implant placement and loading protocols in partially edentulous patients: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:106-134. 3. Joda T, Gintaute A, Brägger U, Ferrari M, Weber K, Zitzmann NU. Time-efficiency and cost- analysis comparing three digital workflows for treatment with monolithic zirconia implant fixed dental prostheses: A double-blinded RCT. J Dent 2021;113:103779. 4. Schiegnitz E, Kämmerer PW, Hellwich P, König J, Sagheb K, Al-Nawas B. Treatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges-A retrospective study comparing narrow-diameter implants in pristine bone with standard-diameter implants in augmented bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2021;32:1159-1167. 5. Torroella-Saura G, Mareque-Bueno J, Cabratosa-Termes J, Hernandez-Alfaro F, Ferres-Padro E, Calvo-Guirado JL. Effect of implant design in immediate loading. A randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:240-244. 6. Pariente L, Dada K, Daas M, Linder S, Dard M. Evaluation of the Treatment of Partially Edentulous Patients With Bone Level Tapered Implants: 24-Month Clinical and Radiographic Follow-Up. J Oral Implantol 2020;46:407-413.

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy NTgyNjk=